자유와 진실을 기록하는 국민 뉴스 플랫폼 : 고구려프레스

주메뉴 바로가기
본문 바로가기

2025.10.11 (토)

표현적 자유 감시

이전

1

포토이슈

HOT 이슈

대한민국의 진실

Korea Election Fraud : Tracing Korea’s Early Voting Anomaly: Did It Begin in 2016?

©이영돈TV :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aN-NDxRqiM' Korea Election Fraud : Tracing Korea’s Early Voting Anomaly: Did It Begin in 2016? Repeating statistical shifts favoring one party appear across multiple elections When did Korea’s early voting anomaly begin? According to Lee Young-don TV, the earliest signs trace back to the 2016 general election. From that year onward, vote share discrepancies between early and election-day voting started to widen—always in favor of the Democratic Party. This pattern intensified in the 2020 and 2024 elections. Statistically, such consistent directionality
Korea Election Fraud : Identical Standard Deviations? Statistician Suggests Election Was Engineered

©이영돈TV :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aN-NDxRqiM' Korea Election Fraud : Identical Standard Deviations? Statistician Suggests Election Was Engineered Vote distributions with matching fourth-decimal deviations defy natural explanation In a striking discovery, Korea’s 2025 election data showed that both major candidates—Lee Jae-myung and Kim Moon-soo—had vote distributions with identical standard deviations down to the fourth decimal place. This symmetry, uncovered by Lee Young-don TV, is statistically implausible. Standard deviation measures the spread of values from the mean; two candidates
Korea Election Fraud : Randomness Defied: Korea’s Early Voting Pattern Raises Scientific Red Flags

Korea Election Fraud : Randomness Defied: Korea’s Early Voting Pattern Raises Scientific Red Flags Early votes should reflect a random cross-section, not partisan uniformity Early voting is intended to reflect individual scheduling needs, not political targeting. Statistically, this means early vote results should mirror general voter distribution. But in Korea’s 2025 election, early voting disproportionately favored one candidate—raising doubts about the randomness of the process. According to Lee Young-don TV’s analysis, early votes showed a consistent partisan bias that defied statistical n
Korea Election Fraud : Conservative Strongholds Flip Left Overnight? Election Results Defy Logic

Korea Election Fraud : Conservative Strongholds Flip Left Overnight? Election Results Defy Logic Sudden reversals in Seocho, Jongno, and overseas voting raise red flags In Korea’s June 3, 2025, presidential election, the most surprising outcome came from traditionally conservative regions that unexpectedly turned blue. Lee Jae-myung, the Democratic candidate, defeated Kim Moon-soo not only in early votes in Seoul’s Seocho and Jongno districts but also in overseas ballots—territories once considered right-wing bastions. In Seocho, where Kim had a strong advantage in previous elections, Lee led
Korea Election Fraud : Negative Correlation Between Early Voting and Democratic Support?

Negative Correlation Between Early Voting and Democratic Support? The more people voted early, the fewer votes went to the Democratic party—statistically baffling In its analysis of Korea’s June 3, 2025, presidential election, Lee Young-don TV uncovered a deeply counterintuitive statistical anomaly: a negative correlation between early voting rates and the Democratic Party’s vote share. Conventional logic suggests that if Democratic supporters favor early voting, then precincts with high early turnout should show higher Democratic support. However, statistical analysis shows the opposite. In m
Korea Election Fraud : Korea’s 2025 Election Mirrors Patterns of Russia and Uganda

Korea Election Fraud : Korea’s 2025 Election Mirrors Patterns of Russia and Uganda PNAS fraud detection model shows disturbing similarities with authoritarian regimes The June 3, 2025, presidential election in South Korea is drawing international scrutiny for its unusual voting patterns. According to analysis cited by Lee Young-don TV, the election data exhibits a statistical structure that closely resembles fraudulent elections in authoritarian countries such as Russia and Uganda—rather than democratic nations like Canada or Switzerland. The method applied stems from a 2011 study published in
Korean Election Fraud : Shocking Vote Split Between Domestic and Overseas Ballots in Korea’s 2025 Election

imgae source: Attorney Juhyun Park TV New data from South Korea’s 2025 presidential election reveals a disturbing discrepancy: while 79.4% of domestic voting districts selected Kim Gun-soo as the leading candidate, a staggering 99.6% of overseas districts reported Lee Jae-myung as their top choice. According to figures analyzed by Attorney Juhyun Park (박주현 변호사 TV), this dramatic vote split has alarmed election watchdogs and citizens alike. Experts argue such a uniform overseas result defies probability and may point to manipulation or vote tampering. Civic groups are demanding a full audit of
[단독] 민주당, 태극기 사랑 폄훼하며 국기법 개정안 발의 논란

더불어민주당 의원들이 뜬금없이 우리나라 국기(國旗)인 태극기 관련 ‘대한민국국기법 일부개정법률안’을 입법예고해 논란을 부르고 있다. 발의자인 민주당 이기헌 의원을 비롯한 박지원·정동영 등 11인이 12일 국회에서 발의한 ‘대한민국국기법 일부개정법률안’은 태극기의 역사성과 의미를 재정립하겠다는 명분을 내세우며, 조선의 고종이 1883년 3월 6일 태극기를 국기로 제정·공포한 역사적 사실을 반영하여 매년 3월 6일을 ‘태극기의 날’로 지정하고 태극기의 날부터 1주일을 태극기 주간으로 한다는 내용을 담고 있다. 이들은 아울러 국가와 지방자치단체는 태극기의 날(태극기 주간을 포함한다) 취지에 적합한 행사와 교육·홍보사업을 실시한다. 이들의 주장은 고종이 태극기를 국기로 공포한 날을 기념일로 삼아 태극기의 가치를 되새기고 정치적 오용을 방지하자는 데 있다. 겉으로 보기엔 일견 그럴듯해 보인다. 하지만 들여다보면, 이 개정안이 지닌 문제점은 적지 않다. ◇태극기의 정치화를 막겠다며 정치화하는 아이러니 법안의 제안 이유는 다음과 같다. “태극기가 특정 정치집단의 집회나 정치적 주장에 반복적으로 사용되면서 특정 집단의 상징으로 오인되는 현상이 발생하고 있다”는 것이다. 다

뉴욕