2026.02.26 (목)

이란

[In-Depth Strategic Assessment] Architecting the Post-Theocratic Order in Iran: The Trump-Pahlavi Nexus and the Dawn of Pax Americana 2.0

Tehran skyline at night with Milad Tower : Image: AI-generated conceptual illustration

[Strategic Assessment] Architecting the Post-Theocratic Order in Iran: A Stabilization Doctrine for a New American Century

 

Executive Overview

 

The collapse of a 47-year theocratic regime would not, by itself, guarantee stability. History has demonstrated that regime removal without structural replacement breeds vacuum, fragmentation, and insurgency. The lesson of Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan is not that intervention fails—it is that incomplete architecture fails.

 

A durable transition in Iran would require simultaneous political synthesis, economic stabilization, and a permanent but disciplined security interlock. This is not an open-ended war posture. It is a finite stabilization doctrine designed to prevent relapse, preclude nuclear reconstitution, and anchor the region within a rules-based order aligned with American strategic interests.

 

1️⃣ Preempting the Vacuum: Political Synthesis Over Chaos 
The immediate danger following regime collapse is not external invasion, but internal disintegration. Ethnic fragmentation, militia proliferation, and institutional paralysis can rapidly metastasize into protracted instability.

 

A constitutional restoration under Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi would serve not as nostalgia, but as a unifying bridge—absorbing republican aspirations while providing symbolic continuity. The early alignment of the conventional military (Artesh) would be decisive in preventing insurgent escalation and ensuring national coherence.

 

This is not merely regime change. It is structured transition.

 

2️⃣ Permanent Deployment as Finite Stabilization Architecture
The central strategic principle is clear: deterrence must be structural, not episodic.

 

A permanent U.S. security presence should not be framed as occupation, but as a Strategic Security Compact—an enduring but mission-defined architecture that accomplishes three non-negotiable objectives:

 

Irreversible Nuclear Denial

 

Nuclear capability is sustained through infrastructure, expertise, and time. Temporary dismantlement invites reconstitution. Only sustained oversight ensures structural prevention.

 

Dismantling the IRGC Ecosystem

 

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps functioned as an integrated military-financial-intelligence conglomerate. Neutralizing its subterranean networks requires continuity of operational presence, not symbolic withdrawal.

 

Deterring External Strategic Encroachment

 

Iran occupies a geopolitical fulcrum between the Caspian basin and the Persian Gulf. A permanent security interlock deters opportunistic maneuvering by revisionist powers without necessitating escalation.

 

This framework is not a forever war. It is a finite stabilization structure with defined objectives, measurable benchmarks, and fiscal self-sufficiency.

 

3️⃣ A Self-Sustaining Security Model
Unlike previous Middle Eastern engagements, this doctrine rests on economic reciprocity rather than American subsidy.

 

Sovereign assets can be unfrozen under conditional transparency.

 

Hydrocarbon export revenues can be directed into a stabilization trust.

 

Security infrastructure and garrison costs can be underwritten by Iranian national revenue streams.

 

This is not American occupation financed by American taxpayers. It is a sovereign state entering a security partnership that guarantees its territorial integrity and economic reintegration.

 

4️⃣ Structural Impact on Eurasian Power Balances
The integration of a stabilized Iran into a Western-aligned order would recalibrate Eurasian geopolitics.

 

Russia’s long-standing southern corridor ambitions would face durable constraint under joint surveillance frameworks.

 

Critical nodes of China’s Belt and Road transit routes would encounter structural rebalancing.

 

Energy logistics would decisively reinforce dollar-based settlement systems, strengthening global monetary primacy.

 

This is not regional micromanagement; it is strategic architecture at scale.

 

5️⃣ Regional Pacification Through Structural Severance
The cessation of Tehran’s proxy financing would fundamentally alter the security landscape.

 

Without sustained patronage, Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis would face logistical contraction. Israel would gain unprecedented strategic depth, while Gulf rivalry could transition from ideological confrontation to competitive economic modernization.

 

Absolute harmony may remain elusive. But the structural drivers of cyclical escalation would be materially reduced.

 

6️⃣ Conclusion: Stability Is Designed, Not Assumed
American power faltered in the past not because it prevailed militarily, but because it withdrew architecturally.

 

A disciplined stabilization doctrine—combining political synthesis, fiscal autonomy, and permanent security interlock—would prevent relapse, deter adversaries, and restore strategic credibility.

 

True hegemony is not the product of abandonment.

 

It is the consequence of design.
마이클 김 기자의 전체기사 보기

고구려프레스는 시민들이 기사를 직접 쓰는 뉴스 플랫폼입니다.
Copyright ©2025 www.goguryeo.press All Rights Reserved

관련기사

11건의 관련기사가 더 있습니다.

포토이슈

이란

더보기